[IxDA Discuss] Most usable doesn't always mean best solution
Elizabeth Buie
ebuie at luminanze.com
Tue Mar 4 07:59:00 PST 2008
Todd writes:
>Elizabeth, there are a lot of people out in the field, especially
>marketing agencies,
Well, there you have it. They're marketing folks. IMNERHO they aren't usability
professionals; they're just calling themselves that.
>I include satisfaction in my definition of usability,
Then would you mind explaining what you had in mind when you said that a design
was less usable but more satisfying? Help me out here.
>You might not see that in your work, but that might be due to the
>industry you're focused in.
I have clients in the government, nonprofit, and commercial sectors.
Which industry did you have in mind? :-)
>Likewise, since I'm not involved in
>government work, where we're not obligated to be bound by ISO
>standards, I see it pretty often.
I am not talking about being "bound" by ISO standards. I am talking about
knowing the definition of usability, which happens to be best captured in
ISO 9241/11. This definition comes up rather frequently among people who
actually *are* usability professionals.
Elizabeth
More information about the Discuss
mailing list