[IxDA Discuss] A badly designed site about bad design
Melvin Jay Kumar
melvink2 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 07:30:47 PDT 2007
While we all discuss the various implications, and I think no one is
wrong. I think ultimately, it depends on the purpose of the site and
why it was created.
It could be just a simple, I just want a basic site to create a list
of all the bad design I encounter and share with some people.
I guess, with that basic premise, the site meets its goals.
Now, if we are talking about visual design, improvement of overall
architecture, etc...etc... definitely this site could do all that.
But if the site meets its intended goal and the users are able to do
what was envisioned, I think it is successful.
My two cents. =)
Regards,
Melvin Jay Kumar
On 10/16/07, Jarod Tang <jarod.tang at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess what I'm trying to say is if the design fails to show people
> > where and how to use the product, that is a failure of the design.. if
> > it does that and the product is still misused, that is a failure of
> > the user.
> Maybe it's a bit risk to think user's failure. It's nearly all come
> from miss design. ;-).
>
> Cheers
> -- Jarod
> --
> IxD for better life style.
>
> http://jarodtang.blogspot.com
> ________________________________________________________________
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ....... discuss at ixda.org
> Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list