[IxDA Discuss] Design research

Jeff Howard id at howardesign.com
Wed May 9 10:53:25 PDT 2007


I believe deeply in the value of intuition in design but I think your
argument is too broad Dan.

Projects don't require research? If you were only discounting the
value of exploratory user research I might be able to get on board,
but your argument seems to dismiss the value of research across the
board. Exploratory research, generative research, evaluative
research. Such a sweeping declaration even precludes simple secondary
research like looking at competitive products.

Not every project requires full blown ethnographic research, but I
think some outside perspective is always valuable. Could I get by
without it? Probably. Then again, it's easy to assume you know a
domain better than you really do. User research really shines when it
uncovers the unknown unknowns--what Boorstin called a Negative
Discovery. Even when research only confirms what you already know, it
puts you on more even footing with the client--to Dave Cronin's
point, to defend design rationale.

But back to my main point. Design research is broader than
exploratory user research. Even if you're just fixing a usability
issue, I believe that it's helpful to conduct some informal
evaluative research on your design solution, even if it's just in
the form of cubicle usability testing.


More information about the discuss mailing list