[IxDA Discuss] Communicating Design/ Deliverables

[Esteban Barahona]

indeed... this cleaner method that you're using leaves less wasted mental
resources in minutae translations.

2007/1/18, Alan Wexelblat <awexelblat at gmail.com>:
>
> I'm personally in favor of static models.  I don't write code (any
> more).  I could pick a code/language/prototyping tool but then I'd
> have to figure out how to integrate that particular system with the
> environment at each company.  I've found static prototypes to be more
> universal (most everyone recognizes paper, Visio, Photoshop, etc) and
> quicker to produce in part because there's less environmental 'drag.'
> If you're spending your time worrying about what version of TCL/Tk
> people have for creating and viewing your prototype then you're not
> spending your time creating design products.
>
> I agree that there are issues of ownership and fidelity of the
> implemented system to the designed and tested prototype, but I'd
> rather work on those issues - which I view as essential parts of
> developing the relationship between IxD/HF and development - than futz
> with installers, compilers, or debuggers.
> ________________________________________________________________
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ....... discuss at ixda.org
> List Guidelines ............ http://listguide.ixda.org/
> List Help .................. http://listhelp.ixda.org/
> (Un)Subscription Options ... http://subscription-options.ixda.org/
> Announcements List ......... http://subscribe-announce.ixda.org/
> Questions .................. lists at ixda.org
> Home ....................... http://ixda.org/
> Resource Library ........... http://resources.ixda.org
>



-- 
http://www.zensui.org