[IxDA Discuss] Apparently, IxD is not obscure enough
W Evans
wkevans4 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 23 17:39:48 PDT 2007
Have all of you taken Tog's interaction test? Have fun - the only reason I
ask is that we have a ton of theory to back us up - but because we are "user
friendly" we don't bring Fitt's Law out much - or talk about the 10 tons of
research behind our gut reactions to design ideas.
Any sufficiently advanced magic...
On 8/23/07, Robert Hoekman, Jr. <robert at rhjr.net> wrote:
>
> Interesting little observation from a project I'm working on:
>
> I, as an interaction designer, make recommendations and *everyone* has an
> opinion. This is normal, of course, and I expect it. But my accessibility
> expert makes recommendations and shoots down ideas left and right, and
> everyone just bows down and concedes.
>
> I think maybe interaction design doesn't sound complicated enough. Maybe
> we
> need to make it sound more complicated, like it's something incredibly
> obscure that you couldn't possibly understand unless you spend at least a
> month at the library.
>
> ;)
>
> (Yes, I realize that debate is a good thing, and my client is great, so no
> don't mistake this for a complaint post.)
>
> -r-
> ________________________________________________________________
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ....... discuss at ixda.org
> List Guidelines ............ http://beta.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .................. http://beta.ixda.org/help
> Unsubscribe ................ http://beta.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> Questions .................. list at ixda.org
> Home ....................... http://beta.ixda.org
>
--
~ we
-------------------------------------
n: will evans
t: user experience architect
e: wkevans4 at gmail.com
-------------------------------------
More information about the Discuss
mailing list