[IxDA Discuss] Motorola Motofone User Experience

Joshua Seiden joshseiden at gmail.com
Thu Dec 7 08:52:26 PST 2006


By what medium beyond the GUI is this phone responsive to user behavior?
Sound design is important, but in the case it's not richly interactive.
Tactile feedback is important, but again in this case it's not richly
interactive.

So--in this case--the richly interactive portion of this experience lies in
the software response to hardware. And--again in this case--the software
responds by means of a GUI. So, are they not thinking about it, or just not
talking about it?

JS

On 12/7/06, David Malouf <dave at ixda.org> wrote:
>
>
> Joshua Seiden wrote:
> > Because without software, it's either ID or User-centered design. That's
> > doesn't mean it's not interesting or valuable. It just means it's not
> IxD.
>
> hmmm? I disagree with that statement.
> While I agree that a digital component is almost always require. Digital
> does not mean "GUI". (I'm interpretting your use of the term software to
> mean software with a graphical user interface).
>
> Phones had an IxD component before they ever had a screen display.
>
> How the phone responds to different interactions? What if it was only an
> IVR system behind it?
>
> GUI is not the only thing that makes IxD.
>
>



More information about the discuss mailing list